О школе |
|
|
The simplest conceivable idea is portrayed in Fig.3. At the one end of the communication link the telephone of a handset is connected electrically to the oscilloscope so that the coming audio signal is displayed at the cathode-ray tube of the oscilloscope as a short burst. At the other end there is no need in action at all: just put the handset into some isolated bowl, making audio connection between the telephone and the microphone. Then, making loud tap or click at the microphone at the left end of the communication link, we generate the short electrical signal which makes first (left) mark at the screen of the oscilloscope. This pulse travels to the right end of the link. Having reached the second handset, the electrical signal first transforms to a sound, then it is reflected from the walls of a bowl, transforms to an electrical signal again, and comes back to the oscilloscope, producing short second (right) mark at the screen. Thus, we seem to be able to easily measure the time interval between the first click and the returned signal. This would be the delay time. But alas! If someone thinks he can use this method in practice then he is doomed: it will not work. Why? Because the best people of the world worked on the telephone for almost a century, having developed it to a state of nearly a perfect device. This needs some additional explanation. Did you ever think how is it possible to send and receive telephone signals through only one wire? Did you ever wonder why during the WWII soldiers used to put only single wire cable for telephone connections? The answer is simple: because the telephone and the microphone of a handset are connected to the same single wire. But if it were so then we would hear our own voice in the telephone while speaking. How it happens that we don’t? Look at the Fig.4. The microphone and the telephone are connected through the transformer (in the early versions of the handsets) which blocks coming the signal from the microphone to the telephone. And visa-versa: the audio signal from the telephone does not generate electrical signal, coming back to the line from the microphone. It means that the bowl in Fig.3 would not create any substantial electrical signal back into the line. In order to overcome this obstacle we have to use four handsets as it is shown in Fig.5. Fig.5. At the active end of the communication link (the right end in Fig.5) someone clicks at the microphone of the first handset, and the signals departs in its long way to the other end of the link at the other continent. At the idle end (the left one in Fig.5) the two handsets are tightened together microphone-to-telephone. Then their inner negative feedback does not affect the returning signal, and it comes safely to another handset at the active end of the link. Here this returned signal has to be inputted into the oscilloscope, creating the second mark at its screen. The space between these marks defines the delay time. 4.
What
kind of equipment do we need for the experiment?
We need four telephones, an oscilloscope, and some simplest electronics to connect the telephone to the oscilloscope. This connection can be done either by disassembling the handset and soldering wires directly to the telephone, or by attaching additional microphone to the telephone of a handset. We chose the second variant since it would leave the handset intact, and we did have a spare microphone. The fait of this spare microphone is very instructive, being worth mentioning here. This summer we spent at Jeju island that is a beautiful place for recreation. And everything was going well until a wave covered the mobile phone of our project leader’s mother. Remember forever as the instruction: if that happens immediately disconnect the battery. Regretfully, we were not wise enough to do so. Very quickly the main chains were dissolved by electrolyze of a salt water, and the mobile phone deceased. The only useful things that we have gotten were the microphone and two telephones. This microphone, the so-called electreth microphone, is really a masterpiece of the technology: compact and very efficient (Fig.6). It is shown together with the needle tag to better understand its dimensions. Below the round cap of the microphone a thermo-contracting plastic tubing is seen which protects gentle leads of the microphone from damage. 5.
The
results of the experiments Initially we measured the delay time within the Suwon city only. The experimental set-up together with the resultant oscilloscope screen-shot is portrayed in Fig.7. Fig.7 The read-out microphone attached to the mobile phone by a sticking tape is seen in the lower left corner of the photograph. It was connected to the oscilloscope through simple amplifier in order to enhance the overall sensitivity. According to the photograph, the delay time within the Suwon city was about 0.4 s. This value must not be considered as something constant because it depends on the provider (KTF in our case). Obviously, this delay is introduced mostly by digital processing since the propagation delay in this case is only several microseconds. Finally we present the result obtained on the line between the Moscow and the Suwon (Fig.8). The parameters displayed in the screen-shot were explained above. Fig.8. Thus, the delay time in this case was recorded equal to 1.1 s, i.e., roughly three times longer than within the city. Again the main part of this delay is composed of the processing time and the so-called group delay within the electronic circuits. 6.
Conclusion We performed a research on the possible sources of the delays in the telephone communication links, and have measured the real values of the delay times within a local city and on the international communication line between the two distant parts of the world. The local delay time within the Suwon city (Republic of Korea) was measured to be 0.4 s . On the international line between the Moscow (Russia) and the Suwon it occurred to be roughly three times longer, i.e., 1.1 s.
|
|